The Northern Astronomical Review, Spring-Summer / 05

*
M 44, the Beehive Cluster in Cancer - also called "Praesepe" (Tomahide Nakaegawa)

http://www.ne.jp/asahi/nakaegaw/piz/)


*
Season: Well, it's "summer" at last over 50 North. Of course, it won't really begin until mid-April. And then its over usually well before 21 September. (Pull those shades down at your summer dachas.)

(Biography: Steve Yaskell is a science author in astronomy and natural history. His articles and insights have appeared in many publications around the world, such as Great Britains' Astronomy Now, as well as Sky & Telescope and The Sciences in the USA, among others. He recently co-authored a book on solar astrophysics and severe global climate change at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. [The Maunder Minimum and the Variable Sun-Earth Connection, WSP:2004])

NAR obtains permission to use material by solicitation. If NAR cannot obtain it at web addresses, NAR publishes with the proviso that NAR will remove it instantly if the discovering author(s)so wishes. All reasonable efforts to contact content contributors are made by NAR. If you wish to reprint articles in whole or part, please obtain permission from NAR. Or drop NAR an email at starthrower1@msn.com. Clearance for rewriting and editing timely news material from Science Magazine was granted by Elisabeth Sandler at the American Association for the Advancement of Science(esandler@aaas.org). This rule generally holds for most scientific journals.
________________________________________________________________

Regular quarterly features

*The quadrant

*Star hopping with small telescopes (Beehive in Cancer, and a careful pat on the lion's head.) (Steven H. Yaskell)

*Star hopping with large telescopes (Galloping galaxies with Darrell Abrahams.)

*Coordinates over 50○ N (Sun, Moon, Moon phases and the planets.)

*NAR guest feature (As a matter of fact, you may be interested in new matter: the Scenario Machine) (Vladimir Mikhailovitch Lipunov of Moscow State University and the Sternberg Astronomical Institute and his team offers you some summertime parameter games.)

*Astronomical science news (Heard the one about the dinosaurs, the asteroid and the dinoflagellates? - hard evidence at last connects to life: Russian scientist's simulations explain the plumes in black holes.)

*In astronomical history (The late, great transit circle.)

*Equipment review (The Sovietski 6 inch...the Russian telescope that doesn't look like "it's ready to kill something.") (Ed Ting)

*Holy Spring (A poem by Dylan Thomas.)
________________________________________________________________

The quadrant \\\*

Time to defrost and put on sunglasses______________________________________

I don’t have any idea how many of you choose to rough it in a backyard or on a hillside without some kind of wind breaking technology when you observe. Alternately I can’t picture you sensible ones who use remote devices when you stargaze since I’ve never used any (yet). If I ever get to, it’ll be an old age project. Those of you with homemade observatories I won’t bother to mention. (You’re too smart for all of us.)

I’m one of those who actually sits on a balcony at 59 North in the winter dressed like an Inuit waiting by a seal hole in the snow with his spear. It is dark and it is cold. Fortunately I have a banister that blocks my neighbor’s lights and most importantly, the wind which never stops up here. I can run into the livingroom after half an hour or so of scanning my east to southwest view. If I want to look north, I have to set up below past the apartment complex’s common washroom and sauna, which abuts a pleasant garden kept by a neighboring couple.

Of course in late February, that pleasant garden is a garden of ice and stone and can be so throughout March, as well. This is the reason why I withhold all my north sky rambling until late March, when, by the end of the month or by April it is tolerable to stand outside for an hour at a time. Then I have a month left to whirl through Cassiopeia and Perseus since by April’s end true darkness ends up here. The midnight sun comes in. Those of us above or near 50 North will have many pellucid yellow and eggshell blue nights until mid July or, as in my case, by the time of the Perseid meteor shower in mid August.

Generally this is a time to pursue other things in astronomy, rather than observing. Like starting that book you wanted to write on comets, for instance. Or polishing a blank by hand for a neighbor kid’s science project in building a small reflector. Sun and Moon observers have fun, solar astronomy and selenology two endless pursuits in sub-Polar eternal summer brightness. It’s time for mosquito repellant and lazy afternoons in the Sun, on a towel or in a canoe, dangling a fishing rod. As the Sun sets think of all that solar insolation which is tanning you, and by so doing, contemplate the discovery of gravitational waves. Dr. Vladimir Lipunov, our guest feature astronomer this issue, hailing from Moscow State University in Russia, has done this with a tool he and his associates developed. There are several projects already ongoing to detect these from different places, some of which Lipunov prompted into being with his research (ACIGA in Australia, GEO600 in Germany, LISA in the USA/EU, TAMA 300 in Japan, and the Italian-French Virgo project, for instance).

Perhaps the LIGO site sums it up best:

The detection of gravitational waves from astrophysical sources is probably one of the most keenly awaited events in the history of astrophysics…Albert Einstein predicted the existence of these gravitational waves in his 1916 general theory of relativity, but only now in the 21st Century has technology advanced to enable their detection and study by science. Although not yet detected directly, the influence of gravitational waves on a binary pulsar (two neutron stars orbiting each other) has been measured accurately, and was found to be in good agreement with original predictions.

*
Guest writer Dr. Lipunov with book and dog.

Among things the existence of gravitational waves might reveal are births and disappearances of neutron stars into black holes, if not the existence of black holes themselves, among others (for instance, a glimpse at how space-time began). But also, as Dr. Lipunov points out, the discovery of new matter, altogether, is predicted. Those of you who are mathematically inclined are invited to visit Lipunov’s site at the links provided in his fascinating article and to work out some parameters.

Let’s tip our glasses to the Russians this summer, who’ve made this northern issue complete. Outside of a look into galactic space much deeper than I can perform (thanks to Canadian Darrell Abrahams, armed with his 16.5 inch goliath) we have a hot, verbal clarion call unto this arctic “summer” (is there ever a “spring” up here?) by the “Lion from Wales” (Tom Jones is the “Bull”) – the poet Dylan Thomas.

Now go get those sunglasses out for the long summer made longer by the “white nights.” Bask in the irradiative effervescence, those "arrows of pure fire," drink your favorite drink and stay cool. We’re children of the cold, having emerged from grasslands, yet mastered snowdrifts. This means that a hot summer is something to endure. But it is also something to indulge in and enjoy.

Steve Yaskell
________________________________________________________________

Star hopping with small telescopes

10th hour: Leo’s ”coeur” through Cancer

Steven H. Yaskell

Spring means arctic twilight returns to the 50th parallel and above; indeed to the whole hemisphere. Heavy coats come off. Daylight started to increase well before 1 January. As Northern Europe cloud cover leaves in March, and harsh polar “white nights” return everywhere else above 50 North including Alaska and Kamchatka Peninsula we bet heavily on clear, warmer nights until April’s end. By mid-May only radio or daytime astronomers operate. Visual silver-on-black-velvet observing is limited until mid August.

We all love dark sky observing. It is more than a shame that it is so rare above Fairbanks, Alaska, St. Petersburg, Russia, and Stockholm, Sweden. Melting snow and the smell of life covers the ground and fills the evening air. After 1800 and until at least 2030 throughout March, Leo (the lion) spreads in full glory across the Southeastern sky. Leo fills the gap left months ago by bright Orion – only higher northeast.

Find Alpha Leonis (Regulus) - the Lion’s “Coeur” – or “heart” - at 10h 8m 22.3 s (right ascension) +11 degrees, 58´ and 02´´ (declination). It is the big star marked on Leo in the star map. Regulus is a helium star with a quite powerful visual (apparent) +1.34 magnitude. Richard Hinckley Allen in 1899 reported that Medieval Europeans thought the star meant royal birth.

Nine degrees of arc northwest of Regulus at + 20 find Algieba (Gamma Leonis). You are now “getting inside the lion’s head” so to speak. Five minutes northeast lifts you to MuLeonis. Mu Leonis and Epsilon Leonis (lowered 4 minutes southwest of Mu Leonis) to the Persians meant “Ras el Asad” or the “head of the lion,” Mu being the northern star and Epsilon being the southern in the lion’s head. Gamma, Mu and Epsilon are all around +3 - +4 visual magnitude. But even in Stockholm’s and Fairbank’s and St. Petersburg’s light pollution they can be seen forming a triangular hook beginning with Algieba (“lion’s mane”) up to Zeta Leonis, on to Mu, then down to Epsilon. Zeta Leonis is very near to the radiant of November’s annual Leonid meteor shower. (The last great one was in 1966, way before many of us were born.)

Jumping off 3rd magnitude Lambda Leonis (west of Epsilon) move from 10h 40m right ascension (r.a.) over to 9h 40m r.a. - from about +22 degrees down to +20 degrees. Now find yourself in the center of Cancer and Messier 44 (M 44) – the Beehive Cluster.

*
M 44 in Cancer. (Tomahide Nakaegawa)

Cancer is the least visible zodiacal constellation. However, Messier’s probable 44th “object to avoid” (to his comet-hunter’s thinking) opens the crab’s belly up to us. It is an open cluster some 500 light years distant and is still called by an old Latin word Praesepe (“little bed”). It is best seen in image stabilizing binoculars or at low power (say, around X 40) in telescopes. In binoculars look for how it seems like a beehive. It is bulb-like, thicker in the middle, with random stars seeming to spin around it, just like bees. M44 gives me a greenish and yellow impression in binoculars – like a real crab. (But this could be due to my forty-seven year old vision.) A Lumicon Deep Sky filter’s 90-100 nanometer bandpass brings out the beehive’s light and intensifies the experience.

*
The Coma Berenices Cluster - Melotte 111. (Jack Schmidling)

As we finish the star grid this time round, take a look way off behind the “tail of the lion” to the south. If you see stars that form a two-towered radio antenna of +3 magnitude stars like buttons in the sky, you are looking at Melotte (MEL) 111 (at 12h 20m over, c. +24 up) an open cluster that dwarfs M44’s seconds of 80 arc sky coverage. It lies in “Berenice’s Hair” - Coma Berenices.
________________________________________________________________

Star hopping with large telescopes

Spring's galactic rush hour

Darrell Abrahams

As a fruit and vegetable gardener, spring is my most hurried time. Trees and vines must be pruned, weeds pulled, soil prepared, seeds planted and seedlings transplanted. All this must be done in the wet and rainy conditions of a Canadian west coast spring. The same can be said for the astronomical viewing of the northerner's spring.

In the autumn as the nights get longer, the fall night sky seems to hardly change. Just as the turning night sky advances west about four minutes earlier each evening, the fall sunset and twilight ending times also recede. This results in a lingering of the same constellations if one continually observes one or two hours after the receding sunset.

*
Charles Messier’s drawing of the Virgo Cluster area in the 18th Century.

The opposite problem happens in the northerner's spring The later sunset times quickly eat into our observing of the spring night sky and before we know it, twilight has consumed our whole early summer sky. Add to that the weather on my “wet coast2 and I'm always rushed in my planned spring observing.

And spring observing is galaxy hunting time. All those lovely and unique galaxies that ride the sky due south of the Big Dipper in Coma Berenices, Canes Venatici, Leo and Virgo. These include the Virgo Galaxy Cluster riding the Coma-Virgo constellation boundry. But where to start? Many succumb to not identifying them and wind up enjoying them by just surfing, scanning, and panning across the area with oohs and aahs but with no real idea of what they're seeing. Others, with large apertures, have fun trying to find the area that has the most galaxies in one field of view. This too is enjoyable, but like watching the different types of birds visiting the bird feeder, they're only just pretty birds until one learns their names, varieties and differences.

*
Cartoon map showing the Virgo Cluster’s location in the Constellation Virgo, low in the southern sky of the high north. (Used with the permission of Kathy Miles, Starryskies.com.)

Galaxy hunting in the Virgo Cluster is a bit like going swimming in a cold mountain lake. It's not something you can wade slowly into while holding someone's hand. You must either run, jump or dive in. It's very invigorating. Just like galaxy hunting. So I recommend you start with a good chart. My first serious dive into the Virgo Cluster was several years ago with my home built eight inch f 8 Newtonian. It was before I owned a copy of the Uranometria 2000 Deep Sky Atlas and my detailed chart of the cluster was a freeware copy of Hallo Northern Sky. With the software I was able to select only the galaxies up to my chosen limit of about magnitude 11.9 I had printed and literally cut and taped together a large close-up chart of the Virgo Cluster and rolled it into a tube.

*
The Virgo galaxy cluster, the giant elliptical M 87 in the square as it would look in large telescopes. In the ellipse to the right is seen lenticular (S0) galaxies M 84 and M 86. Within the “triangle” formed by M 84 and M 85 are seen the edge-on spiral NGC 4388 (mag 12.2), starlike NGC 4387 within the triangle, and dim edgewise NGC 4402 above M86, the barred spiral NGC 4413, and NGC 4425. In the pizza slice you see Markarian's chain of galaxies. (Photo by Dr. Ray White, University of Alabama, text adapted from SEDs, geometrical formatting by NAR.)

*
Now find the same data in Dr. White's photo in this one. (Photo by Richard Crisp,ST10XME imaging camera with Pentax Takkumar 150 mm f/2.8 medium format camera lens. Guide camera was SBIG ST7E on a Takahashi FCT-76 scope. One and one half hour total exposure time.)

Out in the dark, my sidekick Rick and I then started near Epsilon Virginis and worked our way west through the few stars and many galaxies. He held the Dob in place on the current object while I scribbled notes and looked up the hop to the next galaxy. What a riot we had that night. Bagged thirty new galaxies. Once we got lost and had to start all over from the beginning again. But that was all part of the fun. Later at home when updating my log book from my notes, I colored in the galaxies we'd found with a red pencil crayon on the “cut and pasted” chart I'd made.

*
Image shows the Virgo Cluster in X-ray, proof of the youth of the area (compare with image below). (CHANDRA)

*
This photo orients the data shown in the X-ray image above. (CHANDRA)

That was the start of a great galaxy hunt and a new tradition. When I did get my copy of Uranometria (first edition) I continued coloring in the objects I'd visited. Red for galaxies, green for nebulae, yellow for open clusters, orange for globulars and gray for dark nebulae. Within three years I had a moderately colorful Uranometria with over 450 objects colored. I hope I'm more than just a hunter - gatherer. I am enjoying the view and revelling in the many objects unique characteristics. I'm often reminded of the old joke: Did you hear? Vice president ___ 's library burned down. Both books. And he hadn't finished coloring in one of them. (That's me!)

Now with my moderately new 16.5 inch f 5.3 home built Newtonian, I have the new second edition of Uranometria and I'm just hankering to get coloring galaxies. Due to technical difficulties I've missed using the scope both of the last two Springs. My galaxy pages in Virgo and Coma Berenices are mostly just black and white. But this time I'm ready for the Galactic Rush Hour.

(About the author: Darrell Abrahams is a member of the Fraser Valley Astronomers Society of British Columbia, Canada, and is an avid deep sky observer. Why not go to:)

http://www.fvas.net/

(About some of the photos: Richard Crisp is a design engineer who works in Silicon Valley, California, USA. Never satisfied with the detail level gained through the telescope, he has turned to the camera. Through an ongoing, growing, and thorough study of astrophotography and its techniques, with a scientist’s knowledge of how light works, he seeks to engage objects he’s seen in space photographically and frequently lectures on astro-imaging. He is also a peripatetic equipment builder in the astrophotography field. NASA has used some of his photos as the “Astronomy Picture of the Day.” We expect to see more photos from him worked into NAR features, and perhaps his own column on astro-imaging and equipment design/optimization. Visit his site and his friends in the TAC - “The Astronomy Connection" - online at:)

http://www.narrowbandimaging.com/
________________________________________________________________

Coordinates over 50○ N

Sun, Moon and planets

Courtesy U.S. Naval Observatory and Stardate Online

MICA is the Multiyear Interactive Computer Almanac. With it you can obtain sidereal time to your specific location for the Sun, Moon and planets. To use MICA Version 1.5 (available as test or download) you will need to know your latitude and longitude. To find Greenwich Mean Time (which is also Universal Time[UT]) find your local time zone and count forward - or backward -to the time as it would be at Greenwich (in the UK). MICA uses Universal Time (UT) for all its calculations. All you need do it add UT and your latitude and longitude and press a button to get rising and setting times of various Solar System objects. (See link below)

To calculate for planetary and solar postions, see link below (U.S. Naval Observatory MICA program)

http://wwwaa.usno.navy.mil/software/mica)


To find Moon phases for the month

http://www.stardate.org/nightsky/moon)

__________________________________________________________________________________________

NAR guest feature

Artificial universe : seeing ahead with the Scenario Machine

Vladimir Mikhailovitch Lipunov

The Scenario Machine

Based on the present notions of normal and relativistic star’s evolution in binary systems, population synthesis of the universe can be carried out.

This artificially created “Metagalaxy” contains, among well known and clearly understood astrophysical processes and objects, phenomena not yet found, yet which is highly significant for all modern science.

A specially constructed computer program at the Moscow State University - the Scenario Machine - allows predicting the number and main physical characteristics of relativistic binary systems, the discovery of which in forthcoming years will lead to two fundamental results:

* Gravitational waves’ detection

* Confirmation of the existence of black holes

At the links listed below, we show our code. At the present time it allows you to obtain evolutionary tracks of the close binary system with different parameters, which you determine yourself. Please read "How all this stuff works" (http://xray.sai.msu.ru/~mystery/articles/review/ ) in order to get more information about the code and its opportunities, and read "Credits" in order to get some information about the demiurges of the code and its web version. (To build your own track, follow "Go to evolutionary track constructor.")

Welcome to the WWW-world of close binaries!

* Basic parameters

* Kick velocity

* Scenario branches

* Additional parameters

* Output parameters

For more on the above-bulleted parameters, see http://xray.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/scenario.4.0/main_form.4.0.5.cgi

“How all this stuff works”

In the early 1980s our understanding of binary star evolution, based on the pioneer work of Paczynski (1971), Tutukov and Yungelson (1973), van den Heuvel and Heise (1972) allowed us to construct a general evolutionary scenario which successfully explained the genesis of well-studied normal stars, and offered potential explanations for new X-ray sources discovered in space experiments.

It was recognized then that the evolution of binary systems looked like a branching genealogical, or “family” tree whose nodes include important physical processes. These processes are the mass exchange between binary components, the common envelope stage (or “CE”), loss of orbital angular momentum at the expense of gravitational wave emission, the magnetic stellar wind (and so on).

*
Artist's impression of gravitational waves. (LIGO)

On the other hand, it was clear that dramatic new processes should occur after a compact star White Dwarf (WD), Neutron Star (NS) or Black Hole (BH) has been formed in a binary system. Taking account of these processes was especially important in the cases of WD and NS, as they can have strong magnetic fields and rotate rapidly. Here, we come across a new phenomenon in stellar evolution - the evolution of gravitating magnetic compact stars (gravimagnetic rotators). The original idea goes back to pioneer work by V.F. Schwartzman (Schwartzman 1970a, 1971), Illarionov and Sunyaev (1975), Bisnovatyi-Kogan and Komberg (1975), Shakura (1975), Wickramasinghe and Whelan (1975), Lipunov and Shakura (1976), Savonije and van den Heuvel (1977), and Lipunov (1982a) and means that astrophysical manifestations of the magnetized compact star are mainly determined by its interaction with the surrounding plasma by means of two types of physical fields: electromagnetic and gravitational, and the evolution itself represents a gradual change of the character of this interaction. The universality of such an approach is not only its ability to explain apparently such different objects as radio pulsars, X-ray pulsars, X-ray bursters, cataclysmic variables, polars, transient X-ray sources, etc., but also its ability to predict completely new and still undiscovered objects.

Therefore, the realistic treatment of binary star evolution must include both types of evolution:

* The nuclear evolution for the normal stars, and

* The rotational evolution for the compact magnetized stars.

The last fact complicates the evolutionary tree to such a point that the need for a special numerical tool for studying binary evolution (the Scenario Machine), analysis of the observed picture and approval of the evolutionary scenarios is clear (Kornilov and Lipunov, 1983a, b). Now it consists of a large numerical code that incorporates the crucial physical processes in binary systems and takes into account:

* Mass exchange between binary components

* Loss of the orbital momentum due to gravitational waves

* Loss of the orbital momentum due to magnetic wind

* Evaporation of normal stars by radio pulsars

* Spin evolution of magnetic compact stars.

The history of the Scenario Machine can be briefly summarized as follows:

* (a + e) Massive binaries (M ≥ solar mass )

* (a + b + c + e) Low-mass binaries (M < 10 solar mass)

* (a) Massive binaries

* (a + b + c + d + e) All mass

* (a + b + c) All mass

* (a + b + c) Low-mass binaries

Apart from giving an explanation for the known evolutionary stages of binary systems, this code proved to be a powerful tool for studying evolutionary links between different binary star populations (Lipunov, 1994). The results obtained with the Scenario Machine include the following:

* Prediction of nearly 100 new stages of binary systems with magnetized compact companions

* Prediction of millisecond X-ray accreting pulsars

* Explanation of some of the ultra-soft, super-luminous sources as super-accreting compact stars in binaries, which was confirmed by the discovery of a transient X-ray pulsar RX J0059.2-7138 in the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC)

* Prediction and estimation of the number of binary radio pulsars with OB-stars ( ~ 1 per 700 visible galactic pulsars) which was confirmed by the discovery of PSR B1259-63

* Estimation of the number of binary radio pulsars with black holes

* Calculation of the gravitational wave background formed by galactic and extragalactic binaries.

Many important physical effects were shown to follow from the modern evolutionary scenario, among which are those listed below.

* Anisotropy of supernova explosions (that is, these explosions having differing physical properties in different directions) giving “kick'' velocities of young pulsars of ≈ 70-100 km/s

* A significant evolution of supernova rates and binary NS merging rates at cosmological distances

* A strong link between the relative number of binary radio pulsars with different compact components and star burst formation history.

In the future

The results of Scenario Machine computations are aimed at the population synthesis of different types of binary stars in the Galaxy, and in other galaxies. They demonstrate the ability of this method to make an important gross analysis of the modern scenarios for binary evolution, as well as to give interesting qualitative and quantitative predictions which can be checked observationally.

Even the last version of the code used in the Scenario Machine is rather a schematic representation of the evolution of binary systems, which in reality is much more complicated. However, even at the present level the method is obviously indispensable for overall analysis of different evolutionary scenarios, and, hence, for understanding binary stellar evolution as a whole. The future development of the method can be considered from two different points of view.

First, this is the amendment of the method itself in the sense of more adequate and detailed description of stellar evolutionary tracks (as performed by, for example, Pols and Marinus (1994). In fact, this is indeed necessary for some classes of objects (for instance, if we investigate in detail a particular type of object, such as cataclysmic variables, their distributions over masses, orbital periods, etc.). However, here one should always bear in mind that various uncertainties of the modern evolutionary scenario (such as adequate description of the common envelope stage, Roche lobe overflow process, parameters of the magnetic stellar wind, etc.) could hardly make the detailed calculations more precise than they already are (that is, they do remain uncertain to within the same factor of 2).

On the other hand, interesting results (which are more statistically reliable) can be obtained by applying Scenario Machine methods to various examples of extragalactic binary system’s evolution. That is, it may be better not to refer to the evolution of stars, but to the evolution of the baryonic component of our Universe instead.

One important feature revealed by our computations is that practically all populations of stars in galaxies are very sensitive to the previous star formation history. In this connection, a more accurate account of the relevant chemical evolution is urgently needed, and this is what we are going to do in the near future.

(About the author: Vladimir Mikhailovitch Lipunov is Soros Professor at Moscow State University and the Sternberg Astronomical Institute and originated the idea of the Scenario Machine, as well as coordinating the whole project. Also involved are: Mike Prokhorov (Scenario Machine coding & adapting code to the web); Konstantin Postnov (Scenario Machine coding ); Sergey Nazin (web interface design & coding, project coordination); Ivan Panchenko (Scenario Machine coding & Image generation); Sergei Popov (Scenario Machine coding). Parts of this article were excerpted from the Introduction of “The Scenario Machine: Binary Population Synthesis” (Harwood Academic Publishers) http://xray.sai.msu.ru/~mystery/articles/review/ .)
_____________________________________________________________________

Astronomical science news from Science and Nature

Discovery proves mass extinction due to asteroids: a connection to life

Matthew Huber of Purdue University (USA) who has been studying geological biophysics for decades and has found fossil evidence marking rapid global cooling 65 millions years ago. The cooling occurred in the so-called “K-T boundary” (Cretaceous-Tertiary Periods) when a massive asteroid struck Earth, believed to have caused large dinosaur extinction. (Until now only geological proof was cited.)

A Tunisian site, El Kef, contains layers the same age as those of Chicxulub Crater, where the mile wide asteroid struck Earth near modern day Mexico. The evidence for it turned out to be small, cold-loving ocean organisms called dinoflagellates and benthic formanifera. These appeared suddenly in an ancient sea that had previously been very warm at El Kef, right before the impact.

"The fossils indicate that something suddenly made the water cold enough to support these tiny critters," Huber said. What probably caused the prolonged Earth climate-changing cold were dust screens that blocked sunlight for years. Thus an “impact winter” occurred when the asteroid punch forced massive quantities of Earth’s crust into the upper atmosphere.

Huber said that life on the Earth's surface was probably recovering about 30 years after the meteorite impact. But the fossil record shows that cold-loving dinoflagellates were present at El Kef for as long as 2,000 years afterwards. Long term cooling (a thousand years, plus) from this time matches data in climate models.

"It took much longer for the oceans to get back to normal," Huber said.

*
Goodbye, sunshine: asteroid strikes Earth over what are now Mexican skies 65 million years ago. (ABC Science Online)

This discovery certainly has relevance to theories about dinosaur extinction. The findings can also help experts understand recent climate change. It also sheds light as to what happens to Earth’s climate after sizeable asteroid collisions. (ABC Science Online, June 2004; letter to Geology: June 2004, Vol. 32, No. 6, pp. 529-532.)

Simulations seem to explain jets in black holes

Some scientists are actually trying to describe aspects of black holes rather than just theorize about them.

Vladimir Semenov of the Institute of Physics at the University of St. Petersburg (Russia) admits that the origins of jets emitted by black holes are poorly understood. Two possible energy sources of these jets are accretion disks or the rotating black hole. Simulations involving magnetohydrodynamics explain these jets in models. The physics of the jet initiation is explained by a black hole gravitohydromagnetic theory in their paper. (V. Semenov et al, Science, August 2004).

Relax...it's the moon

*
Primary celestial object over 50 N in the summer.


_____________________________________________________________________

In astronomical history...

The measure of time using space: transit instruments and other beginnings of astrometrics

Steven H. Yaskell

“Transits, or transit telescopes are part of a triplet of astrometric instruments that include transit circles and meridian circles. They were used to measure time and meridian.” (Encyclopedia Britannica)

With Johannes Kepler’s Rudolphine Tables the most accurate measurements of the northern hemisphere’s stars became available, the combined work of himself and the skilled naked eye observer from Denmark, Tycho Brahe. With these tables the world of studied, practical astronomy could be said to have begun.

What was most practical to astronomy at the time were affairs of state, tied to needs for faster and better navigation across seas. This was for the purpose of discovery, conquest, and economic expansion driven by widening and forever warring European populations. There were, for example, no practical, independent ship’s clocks until the late 18th Century. Sea captains and crews as late as this time coursed the world’s oceans using eye-based celestial navigation. Tools such as sextants and quadrants and rule of thumb memory guided the wits of ship’s pilots, and two of these three required clear skies. Galileo devised a system of telling time exactly at sea depending on the position of Jupiter’s moons. Yet this method, too, required nifty seeing, not to mention the availability of Jupiter in the sky. (And why not throw in a telescope for good measure?) Bad weather delayed point-to-point shipping of goods, travellers, and soldiers. This negatively effected markets and empires equally. Royal leaders were angry, as were their commerce-hungry subjects.

*
Ole Römer at home, measuring with his transit instrument. Observe the clock panels on the left as he guides the instrument while looking into an illuminated telescope containing grids. He first observed from the Round Tower in Copenhagen. (Woodcut from Wolf)

A better set of star tables was all well and fine, thanks to Kepler’s efforts. Right ascensions and declinations of known stars sped the process of place identification and motion across waters with these and the available navigating tools of the sailor. Yet practical shipping needed constant improvement due mostly to not having any real ship’s clocks to rely on. Transit measurement grew in importance while the world sought a stable ship’s clock. The need for having instruments to determine latitude, for instance, was such that the French king created the Paris Observatory in 1667 (Pannakoek: 1962). If so, a slew of observatories with similar agendas sprung up in England, Sweden, Russia, Denmark and elsewhere - following in short order. Savants and scholars alike tackled problems of measuring time with the help of space, from the aforementioned Galileo to the pragmatic Frenchman, Jean Picard, and in particular, to Ole (or Olaus) Römer, one of Picard’s men who would himself become a practical problem solver in his native Denmark.

Römer edited his famous countryman’s (Brahe’s) papers early on, perhaps in preparation to conceiving the transit instrument. Arguably, Römer was the first to have the idea of attaching a telescope to a meridian transit instrument (Westfall: 2004). Picard became the Dane’s patron in Paris, inviting him to the French academy and to the observatory where Römer learned how to observe like the remarkable Frenchman. There should be little doubt that Picard’s instrument making informed the Dane’s own thinking.

*
Ole (or Olaus) Römer. Somewhat like Newton with England’s mint Römer conducted reforms on Danish weights and measurements and attended to other practical concerns. (Wolf)

The device was a telescope mounted at right angles affixed to a horizontal axis. It faced east-west. When the axis was moved in the revolving motion, the line through the telescopic sight traced out the meridian. As he had improved the micrometer (see autumn 2004 edition, NAR) Römer similarly simplified measuring celestial angles, as it could be well thought that the Paris Observatory employed dozens to move about various equipment while performing different tasks requiring precision. Simplification was due.

As better land clocks made their appearance in this century so marked by the importance of time, Römer’s improvements of the transit process included land clocks. His common focus in the eyepiece was a web of horizontal and vertical wires, all of which were illuminated by a lamp, lens and reflector, a beam of candlelight flashing on the wires from a hole in the telescope’s side. As clocks ticked out seconds Römer could observe the wires move as the circle moved with his twisting the instrument, as any would turn the worm-screw of a German telescopic mount. So the time of transit across the meridian could thus be calculated. The illumination probably helped keep the light sky (blue or cloudy) from interfering with the daylight measurement process.

*
Partially restored transit (circle, possibly a Reichenbach) from the late 1700s at the old observatory (Gamla Observatoriet) in Stockholm, Sweden, in the original room used to measure the prime meridian. Römer might have recognized one like this. Observe the circle on the pillar to the left. (Photo by the author)

Errors were found in the measurements and rounded off, time of clock tick versus instrument movement. Differences in right ascension could be found. The declinations corresponding to these were read off through a microscope. The microscope was carried round by an index perpendicular to the axis of the instrument (probably that marked “E” in the woodcut in Wolf, above). It travelled over a graduated circle.

As all his instruments and records of observations vanished in a fire in 1728, we may never know exactly how Römer made and used his instruments.

Meridian measurement hits high gear

Countries sought to align themselves with the rest of the world geographically, from the shifting of the prime meridian to going onto standard time (for example, Sweden, in 1879). Observatories performed more standard functions related to time keeping and travel rather than deep space study alone, and sought a global reach. Modern markets had forced this standardization and the accurate ship’s clock helped markets grow. In Sweden's case the issue of the meridian was solved by going international, when Stockholm and Gothenburg could not decide on the location, accepting the compromise of a mid-point between these two cities. In 1900, the observatory started to follow Greenwich Mean Time – something not all nations were willing to do, as the British Empire’s might and worldwide reach had more to do with making it the beacon of world commerce and hence, universal time setting, whether here on Earth, or in space. In any case, a universal measure was needed for this, somewhere, and Sweden and other nations fell in step with Britain.

To put all this into perspective, however, requires contemplating Römer’s pioneering work and a quick study of some German instrument makers and astronomers who fine-tuned the processes. Georg von Reichenbach introduced the meridian, or transit, circle in the late 1700s. With it one could measure both the time when a celestial body is directly over the meridian (the longitude of the instrument) and the angle of the body at meridian passage. Reichenbach’s instrument making took on industrial process proportions in Munich, giving the astronomer Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel the chance to determine accurately positions of 9th magnitude stars from +15 declination, eventually to +45 (Pannekoek: 1962). Using a Reichenbach meridian circle over a period of 13 years, Bessel accumulated an atlas of over 75,000 stars in exact positions. Given that Bessel was the first man to accurately determine parallax, there is no need to boast of the accuracy he and his assistant Argelanger achieved in the Bonner Durchmusterung and other maps. That he greatly improved Kepler and Brahe’s work is understatement.

*
Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel (Pannekoek)

With Bessel and others, astrometrics could be construed as having arrived on the scene in modern mathematical science. Astrometry lies out, as one definition has it, “the inertial system of space coordinates and a coordinated scheme of fundamental astronomical constants, realizing the connection of this system with Earth, on the basis of the receipt of coordinates of celestial objects and the study of the rotational irregularities of Earth.” It is a measured base for practical astronomy and geodesy, geophysics, and geology. Practical architecture and the construction trades are linked to it as much as today’s space travel. The theodolite was invented by Reichenbach, by the way: every land surveyor’s key tool.

*
Reichenbach meridian circles with their telescopes, as Bessel used them (sketch above from Pannekoek).

*
...and as a Reichenbach and Ertel (left to right) exist in storage at the Gamla Observatoriet in Stockholm, Sweden. (Photo by the author)

Once again, there was a shift in emphasis as to what these instruments were used for. By the early 1800s, reliable ship’s clocks of the Harrison type were aboard all ocean going vessels. And even if map coordinates, time, and other functions were still being determined locally in nations across the world, standardization was creeping in. In the timeframe of 1800-1900, other brands of transit “telescope” and meridian had their birth, such as the Megele, Bamberg, and the Salmoiraghi and Ertel. Error correction was ever more refined, as well as determining star positions more accurately.

*
The six inch transit circle by Warner & Swasey at the United States Naval Observatory, and now out of commission. (USNO)

The instruments were used to aim the largest telescopes in the world and many large telescopes saw their birth toward the end of the 19th Century. Did the importance of what transits did shift back to “big astronomy?”

Transit circles indeed had collimation uses. Like every other country, the United States installed a transit circle (the 6-inch transit circle at the United States Naval Observatory) built in 1898 by Warner & Swasey. It went out of service in 1995. They were used to assist the infant satellite and space exploration programs of the 1950s and 1960s, as it had earlier aided Earth bound telescopes. But now their use has diminished to a mere whisper from its former roar.

Transit Circle telescopes are being replaced by newer instruments capable of determining stellar positions to an accuracy of 0.01 arcseconds, up from the 0.05 arcseconds the Warner & Swasey transit could obtain. This is interferometer technology such as the Very Long Baseline Interferometer (VLBI) array of radio telescopes measuring the precise positions of distant quasars, and optical interferometers. Precise positions of distant quasars, probably the furthest thing at a distance so measurable, are now gathered. Such a framework formed by these distant objects, back measured towards our Earth, allow tiny oscillations of Earth’s rotational poles to be measured.

The worlds of Römer and Bessel recede more deeply into history. We now plumb the depths of space to such an extent that space mapping for the purposes of Solar System navigation and telescope aiming will be more exact, common and seamless than ever before.

Sources

Römer, Picard: Compiled by Richard S. Westfall from original Danish and French sources (Department of History and Philosophy of Science, Indiana University – Internet, 2004); A History of Science and Technology in the 16th and 17th Centuries, Vol. 1, by A. Wolf (George Allen & Unwin LTD: 1962)

Kepler, Brahe: Casper, M., Kepler (Dover: 1993); Moore, P., Watchers of the Stars (Michael Joseph : 1973)

Picard, Bessel, Argelander, Reichenbach: Interview with Inga Elmqvist (curator) Gamla Observatoriet (Kungl. Vetenskapsakademien) June, 2002 by the author; Lindroth, S., Kungl. Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens historia (1739-1818) (Stockholm: 1967) pp 398-411; Pannakoek, A., A History of Astronomy (Dover : 1989) and various Internet sources.

Other: United States Naval Observatory website, Sobel, D., Longitude (Fourth Estate: 1995)
___________________________________________________________________

Equipment review... Sovietski 6" f/8 Reflector 3/10/00 (6" f/8 equatorial Newtonian, AC RA drive, 42 mm, 25 mm, 15 mm, 4X barlow $649 + $75 shipping) (Now sold by Talscopes as TAL-2)

By Ed Ting

I am just old enough to remember when being an "amateur astronomer" meant that you owned a 6" reflector. Twenty or thirty years ago, it was all you could get - a far cry from today. Nowadays, it seems like nobody makes them anymore.

Imported from Russia by Mitch Siegler, Sovietski sells Russian optical equipment, along with lots of other pieces of Russian memorabilia (ask for their catalog.) I remember my first encounter with a Sovietski telescope at a star party. Two things stuck me: First, the scope produced some really nice images, and secondly, it seemed to take the owner forever to set it up.

And so it was that I found myself going through those same experiences. This telescope was supplied as a review sample from Sovietski. The scope arrived in two huge -and I do mean huge- shipping containers. I found myself pondering how it was possible for a scope weighing 68 lbs to have a shipping weight of 166 lbs. Yes, the containers for this 6" scope weigh MORE than the 20" Obsession they were sitting next to.

*
The 6" Sovietski.(photo by Ed Ting.)

You get a lot for your $650. The tube and most of the mount come neatly packed away in a massive 91 lb dovetailed pine box resembling a coffin. The equatorial head comes in a second, smaller pine box. The designers of this telescope must have lived by the motto "A place for everything, and everything in its place" because there seems to be a little alcove, or wooden holder for each part of the scope. In fact, I had some difficulty remembering where everything went when it came time to repack and return the scope.

As I hinted above, it takes a while to put all this stuff together. However, unpacking and assembling a telescope for the first time ranks as one of Life's Great Pleasures, and I didn't mind. The parts of the scope are large, beefy, and heavy. Some parts, like the threads on certain bolts, come conveniently lubricated. Unfortunately, other parts, like the declination shaft and most of the finder bracket, are not only lubricated, they arrived positively slathered in grease. I had to run inside a number of times during assembly to wash my hands.

Once assembled, I moved the scope outdoors on a cool, crisp night. The scope is nicely finished, and is in sharp contrast to the military-looking cosmetics on most other scopes from the former Soviet Union. The scope is -dare I say it- even attractive, something I never thought I'd say about a Russian telescope. This Sovietski is the first Russian scope I've ever seen that didn't look as if it were getting ready to shoot something.

The primary is spherical. Despite this, it shows really nice images. I did a mini Messier tour through the winter sky and hit the Virgo Cluster. The scope's images were clear and contrasty. The 8X50 finder is wonderfully sharp, almost to the edge. In an age when most of the major manufacturers are trying to put the cheapest possible finders on their scopes, this was refreshing. Of the eyepieces, I liked the 25 mm Plossl the best. The supplied 4X barlow is also of good quality. The 42 mm Kellner had a too- narrow FOV, and the 15 mm Kellner was too tight on eye relief.

A spherical mirror is an undercorrected mirror, and this showed up in the star test at 150X, which revealed about 1/4 wave of spherical aberration. I didn't notice much, if any, degradation of the image because of this.

It wouldn't be a true Russian telescope without a few quirks, so here they are. You practically have to disassemble everything to put the pieces back into those pine boxes. The drive is AC only. There is no lens cap for the finderscope. The rings look like they will fit on any mount, but they won't - they're keyed to the plate on the supplied mount. The mount's controls are a little clunky. Finally, the instructions are like a long Russian winter: grey, and a little dreary.

I enjoyed my time with this telescope. Although it's only 11 lbs heavier than the Meade Starfinder, it feels far more substantial and solid. The Meade, in fact, feels positively dainty next to this Sovietski, with its plastic focuser and finder, paper tube, etc. But the Meade costs a lot less, at $499. So take your choice, as they're both recommended.

In a time of Goto-this and Apochromatic-that, is was nice to spend a few nights enjoying a simple, traditional 6" f/8 Newtonian. I can tell you that I seriously considered buying the review sample, but in the end I could not justify yet another telescope in the garage. It went back to Sovietski without me.

(About the author: Ed Ting has been reviewing right-off-the-assembly line telescopes and related equipment for years in magazines such as Sky & Telescope and many others. He lives in Connecticut, USA.)
___________________________________________________________________

Holy Spring

Dylan Thomas

O

Out of a bed of love,

When that immortal hospital made one more move to soothe

The cureless counted body,

And ruin and his causes

Over the bed and shooting sea assumed an army

And swept into our wounds and houses,

I climb to greet the war in which I have no heart but only

That one dark I owe my light,

Call our confessor and wiser mirror but there is none

To glow after the god stoning night

And I am struck as lonely as a holy maker by the sun.

No

Praise that the spring time is all

Gabriel and radiant shrubbery as the morning grows joyful

Out of the woebegone pyre

And the multitude’s sultry tear turns cool on the weeping wall,

My arising prodigal

Sun the father his quiver full of the infants of pure fire,

But blessed be hail and upheaval

That uncalm still it is sure alone to stand and sing

Alone in the husk of man’s home

And the mother and toppling house of the holy spring

If only for a last time.

(About the author: Dylan Thomas [1914-1953] Welsh poet, writer, playwright and popularizer of the performed “poetry reading” died under mysterious circumstances due to chemical imbalances and drug and alcohol abuse at 39. He believed word sound nearly obviated their meanings and gained quite a following, though damned for his highly emotional engaging of intellectual audiences in Europe and abroad [he was ten years ahead of his time]. Disturbed, he would have received medical treatment today for depression. Battling poverty all his life -another cause for depression in a high strung soul- near the end he received contracts for thousands of dollars per week to read in the United States. But by that time his mental condition hardly allowed him to notice. Lyrical, intense and expressing a Celtic love of words, nature, imagery and God probably unparalleled in the language, and disdaining “intellectual poets” [such as Eliot and Auden] he was the favorite of a fellow Welshman, the actor Richard Burton, whose life strangely paralleled his favorite poet’s.)

*
Clouds after a storm. (Marianne Maynard Klanfer)


Return to NAR homepage

NAR homepage

1

Hit Counter